Multiple Sclerosis Relapse Specialist Rehabilitation ProgrammeSt Cyril’s Rehabilitation Unit offers a prompt assessment and admission policy to MS patients presenting with acute relapses and sudden loss of function. Our team is very experienced in the management of neurological impairments in general and MS in particular. Our rehabilitation programme integrates physical and occupational therapy with a robust medical supervision and management. The psychosocial impact of the illness is addressed by a caring and experienced staff. Throughout the rehabilitation programme, close liaison with the patient’s neurological, primary care and community rehabilitation teams is secured to ensure the integration of the programme with the overall management strategy. BackgroundIn the early stages of MS, 85-90% of patients presents with a relapsing remitting course (1). This group of Patients are often prescribed disease modifying drugs to reduce the frequency and severity of the relapses (2). However, for most patients the relapses are still unpredictable and often lead to a sudden deterioration of the condition and loss of function (3). The standard practice is to use steroids to manage the acute relapses in conjunction with a multidisciplinary rehabilitation programme (4). The evidence of the superiority of rehabilitation programmes to pharmacological intervention alone is overwhelming (5,6,7,8,9). A common scenario is of an MS patient with a relapse finding her/himself unable to cope at home. This usually results on an either inappropriate admission to an acute hospital ward or transfer to a nursing home. Both solutions are unsatisfactory and can lead to further deterioration of the patient and considerable waste of resources. Unfortunately, inability to provide rehabilitation at such early stage - when a window of opportunity to reverse the impact of the relapse still open - often leads to permanent loss of function with clinical complications such as joint deformities or pressure sores. Care pathway for specialist MS relapses inpatient service
Input of different disciplines during admissionThe following is an estimate of the expected input from our clinical team: Indicators of effectiveness and service monitoringThe following outcome measures will be evaluated on admission, 6 weekly and on discharge: The service will be subjected to the same rigorous clinical governance procedures as other clinical services in the St George’s Health Care Group. This will include regular clinical audits, which constantly feedback to improve treatment and care to ensure standards are met. Tariff: Cost on Assessment References:1 - Lublin FD, Reingold SC. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an internationalsurvey. National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Neurology 1996; 46 (4): 907–11 2- Johnson KP. Control of multiple sclerosis relapses with immunomodulating agents. J. Neurol. Sci. 2007; 256 Suppl 1: S23–8. 3- Weinshenker BG. Natural history of multiple sclerosis. Ann. Neurol. 1994; 36 Suppl: S6–11 4- Brusaferri F, Candelise L. Steroids for multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. J. Neurol. 2000; 247 (6): 435–42 5- Khan F, Turner Stokes L, Ng L, et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for adults with multiple sclerosis (Review). Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;2:CD006036. 6- Freeman JA, Langdon DW, Hobart JC, et al. The impact of inpatient rehabilitation on progressive multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1997; 42: 236–44. 7- Craig J, Young CA, Ennis M, et al. A randomised controlled trial comparing rehabilitation against standard therapy in multiple sclerosis patients receiving intravenous steroid treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003; 74: 1225–30. 8- Francabandera FL, Holland NJ, Wiesel-Levison P, et al. Multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: inpatient vs. outpatient. Rehabil Nurs 1988; 13: 251–3. 9. Patti F, Ciancio MR, Reggio E, et al. The impact of outpatient rehabilitation on quality of life in multiple sclerosis. J Neurol 2002; 249: 1027–33. |
Home
▼Our Hospitals
▼Future Developments
Our Services
Philosophy and Values
▼Careers
▼Galleries
Downloads
Useful Links
News
Contact Us
◀ A ▶Site Preferences
Follow us on Twitter
|